![]() This makes the deduction mechanic more important since you can never be sure of the strength of an opponent’s piece.Īt this point I want to point out that there are two versions of Game of the Generals. If you never see the other other player’s pieces, you only have an idea of the strength of the other piece based on the outcome of the battle. You then know what the piece is and the game becomes more of a memory game as you try to remember your opponent’s pieces that have been revealed. In Stratego you get to see the other player’s piece during a battle. I have to say that this is probably an improvement over Stratego. By utilizing an arbiter neither player will know the exact strength of the other player’s piece. The arbiter is a third player or an electronic computer that compares the two pieces in a battle and tells the players which piece is eliminated. Probably the most significant difference between the two games is the fact that Game of the Generals utilizes an arbiter. So instead of dwelling on Stratego lets look at where Game of the Generals differs from it. The game deserves a lot of credit for creating interesting deduction mechanics but there have been better games released since Stratego came out. Basically I think Stratego is a solid family game that I would play every so often. ![]() ![]() Since most people have played Stratego before, I am not going to really talk about the mechanics that the two games share since most people probably already have an opinion on them. There are so many similarities between the two games that I think it is easier to compare the differences than look at the similarities. The black player has moved their flag to the other side of the board and has won the game.Īs I have already mentioned Game of the Generals shares a lot in common with Stratego.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |